February 29, 2016 – Pyriproxyfen, an insecticide, is rumored to be the real cause of increased cases of microcephaly in Brazil, not the Zika virus.
A group of scientists in Argentina claim that their studies show Pyriproxyfen is the real culprit. But other scientists are dismissing these claims. What is Pyriproxyfen? Is it used in the United States and could it pose a danger here?
What products use Pyriproxyfen in the United States?
Pyriproxyfen was first introduced to the U.S. in 1996 to protect cotton crops against whitefly. It’s also used to protect other types of crops. In the U.S., it’s often marketed under the name Nylar. The pesticide is not used in the drinking water, like it is in Brazil.
According to a 2012 EPA study posted in the Federal Register, Pyriproxyfen is registered in the U.S. for flea and tick control in the home and on pets, as well as indoor and outdoor ant and roach control. Formulas include carpet powders, foggers, aerosols, shampoos, bait, and pet collars.
Many flea and tick over-the-counter medicines for pets contain Pyriproxyfen. According to Mercola, Bayer says the insecticide targets the hormone pathways of insects but doesn’t affect mammals.
However, back in 2011, Dr. Karen Becker, a veterinarian, wrote on Mercola’s website that Pyriproxyfen was a newer chemical and an EPA test showed it decreased body weight and toxicity in the offspring of animals exposed to the chemical. She recommended not using it on pets, but not all vets agree with her assertion.
According to FederalRegister.gov, the EPA did not find high toxicity with Pyriproxyfen: “Pyriproxyfen is of low acute toxicity by oral, dermal, inhalation, and ocular routes of exposure.” The EPA went on to say that Pyriproxyfen is not a neurotoxic chemical and there’s no evidence of prenatal or postnatal sensitivity in rats or rabbits. There are also no adverse effects on the immune system.
According to WHO, Pyriproxyfen mainly affects the liver in mice, rats, and dogs, and can change cholesterol concentrations. It may also lead to anemia at high doses. The WHO paper did mention that in rats’ development, there was some effects on growth at very high levels but no signs of neurotoxicity and no recorded effects in a more conventional study. However, there was “an increased frequency of skeletal variations … in fetuses” when administered at a high dose of 300 mg/kg of body weight per day. At higher doses in rabbits, there were some signs of abortion and premature delivery.
A bulletin published by WHO in February 2016 read, in part: “Currently, the association with the ZIKV infection is the most explored possibility. Evidence of perinatal transmission … together with its strong neurotropism and its documentation in amniotic fluid of foetuses with microcephaly are factors that favour this hypothesis. However, if the ZIKV were indeed introduced in Brazil at the World Cup in mid 2014, the outbreak of microcephaly would have preceded it.”
The bulletin added:
ZIKV has been identified in Africa over 50 years ago, and neither there nor in the outbreaks outside Africa, such an association with microcephaly has been reported. Many other potential factors need to be considered as the cause of the outbreak.”
Among those factors are associated infections, viral infections, and teratogens exposure such as to vaccines or drugs used in early pregnancy. WHO added that malnutrition should also be considered.
In Brazil, Pyriproxyfen was added to the water supply in 2014 to combat the larva of mosquitos that carried the Zika virus. Some scientists now believe that Pyriproxyfen was the real cause of the increased microcephaly cases, not the Zika virus. But other experts disagree.
Argentina-based doctors with the group Physicians in Crop-Sprayed Towns (PCST) published a report questioning if Pyriproxyfen might be linked to increased cases of microcephaly in Brazil, Fox News Latino reported. The group said that microcephaly was being reported in areas of Brazil where Pyriproxyfen had been added to the drinking water, Tech Times reported. In the state of Pernambuco, where the Aedes aegypti mosquito lives in high numbers, Pyriproxyfen was added to the water reservoirs. Pernambuco was the first state to notice a microcephaly problem and accounts for 35 percent of the cases in Brazil.
PCST added that Zika epidemics in locations where Pyriproxyfen wasn’t added to the drinking water had not reported increased cases of microcephaly. They cited Colombia as an example, where 3,177 pregnant women with Zika gave birth but there was not a single case of microcephaly.
Other scientists disagree with the group’s findings and still believe that microcephaly is tied to pregnant women catching the Zika virus from infected mosquitos. Tirumalai Kamala, an immunologist, has pointed to two reports that show evidence of Zika in the placenta and brains of fetuses lost in miscarriages, Inquisitr reported. WHO has not said that Zika definitely causes microcephaly, but has said the circumstantial evidence for Zika causing microcephaly is suggestive and worrisome.
Sumitomo Chemical issued a statement saying there was “no scientific basis” for the doctors’ claim. It added that WHO has approved Pyriproxyfen since 2004 and the EPA has approved it since 2001.